Monday, May 31, 2010

The Typical Day of an Intern

Friends and family have been asking what, exactly, my day as an intern looks like. So I thought I'd write it out for everyone. In detail.

So! This is what I do!

7:30am - Alarm goes off. 'Snooze' is immediately hit.

7:35am - Alarm goes off again.

7:40am - More snooze.

7:45am - Finally roll out of bed. Literally.

7:45-8:05am - Apply makeup with unsteady hands. Reapply. Straighten hair.

8:05-8:15 - Scarf down breakfast. Whatever is available. Just be careful - milk has a tendency to go bad.

8:15-8:25am - Dig through suitcases/drawers for some semblance of a work-appropriate outfit. Try to locate shoes.

8:25-8:30am - Talk to Darlene and the dogs.

8:30am - Darlene drops me off at the bus stop. Which I could walk to (easily), but who am I to turn down a ride?

8:30-8:45am - Flip through the free paper at the bus stop. Shoot angry morning glares at the creepy man who sometimes is at the bus stop, too.

8:45-9:05am - Take bus to the Pentagon. Avoid stepping on anyone's toes. Avoid falling into anyone's lap due to jerky bus movements. It's one of my biggest fears, and so far I've avoided it.

9:05-9:40am - Take two trains to get to Tenleytown. Am sometimes smushed between sweaty, overweight, crabby adults. Am sometimes farted on. Or stepped on.

9:40am - Blessed Starbucks, served by an attractive man with dreads. One of these days, I will learn your name, and we will be friends who know each other's names.

9:50am - Arrive at work.

9:50-10am - Chat with Naomi and Elaine. Get settled in for the day. Drink more Starbucks.

10-11am - Read first partial of the day. Could be good. Could be bad. More than likely, average. Or bad.

11-11:25am - Write report on said partial. Usually involving the words, "I would suggest passing on this manuscript."

11:25-1pm - Chat with other intern. Read another partial. Write another report.

1pm(ish) - Lunchtime! This could involve wandering around Wisconsin Ave. trying to find food, overheating something I brought in the microwave, or ordering Thai.

1:45-5pm - Read another two-three partials. Write more reports. Talk to the other interns more. Ask Naomi questions. Eat cupcakes.

5pm - Walk back to the metro. Consider stopping by Best Buy for a new camera battery. Decide I'm too tired, and continue on my way.

5:15pm - Catch the first train back home.

5:30pm - Second train.

5:45-6pm - Wait for the bus. I still don't know what times they come at.

6:30pm - Arrive at bus stop.

6:40pm - Arrive home. Crash. Die.

The end!

(And yes. I seriously do love my job. So much. It makes being farted on worth it.)

Saturday, May 29, 2010

Contest! (Edited)

It's Contest Time!
(Edited)

Lately, I've been seeing a lot of contests on the blogs I follow, and naturally, I wanted in on this latest fad. I'm a follower, what can I say? So I sat down and thought to myself, 'Hmm. What could I possibly do that wouldn't involve a lot of work, but still be awesome?'

Luckily, my last entry gave me an idea.

The contest is simple - All you have to do is be my #? follower!

That's right, I changed it. 50 was too boring. Plus, now none of you know which new follower will win. I have a Super Special Secret Number (between 20 and 60) in my head. If you happen to be that follower, you win! All you have to do is keep your fingers crossed and sign up to follow me!

The Prize: The winner will receive one of the books on my favorites list! You tell me a little bit about what you like to read, and I'll do my best to match it to something on my list (you'll have to let me know if you've already read some of them so I don't send you a duplicate).

And that's it! Pretty simple, right?

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Favorite Books

I received an anonymous comment on my last entry, asking me to post a list of my favorite books. Because I'm a sucker for reading, and for coercing people to read books I love, I was more than happy to oblige! These books are my absolute favorites, or ones I've really enjoyed. Some of the YA books are ones I've loved since I was a kid, and I'm not ashamed to admit I still read them.

These are in no particular order.

ADULT:
The Cheney Duvall series by Lynn & Gilbert Morris
The Atonement Child by Francine Rivers
Redeeming Love by Francine Rivers
Waiter Rant by Steve Dublanica
The DaVinci Code by Dan Brown
When You Are Engulfed in Flames by David Sedaris
As I Lay Dying by William Faulkner
Hamlet by William Shakespeare
Staggerford by John Hassler
A Child Called It by Dave Pelzer
Kitchen Confidential by Anthony Bourdain
The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon
Daughter of the Game by Tracy Grant
The Historian by Elizabeth Kostava
Girl With a Pearl Earring by Tracy Chevalier
Chocolat by Joanne Harris
Timeline by Michael Crichton

YOUNG ADULT:
The Book Thief by Markus Zusak
The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins
The Society of S by Susan Hubbard
Harry Potter by JKR
The Giver by Lois Lowry
Kissed by an Angel by Elizabeth Chandler
Ella Enchanted by Gail Carson Levine
The Dark is Rising series by Susan Cooper
Stolen by Lucy Christopher
Shade's Children by Garth Nix
Secrets of the Nile (Nancy Drew & Hardy Boys) by Carolyn Keene
To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee
One Last Wish series by Lurlene McDaniel

BOOKS I CAN'T WAIT TO GET MY HANDS ON:
Crescendo by Becca Fitzpatrick
Flyaway by Lucy Christopher
The Dead-Tossed Waves by Carrie Ryan
The Meaning of Night by Michael Cox
The Year of Disappearances by Susan Hubbard
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies by Seth Grahame-Smith
Whores on the Hill by Colleen Curran
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo by Stieg Larsson
The Line by Terri Hall
Living Dead Girl by Elizabeth Scott
Mockingjay by Suzanne Collins

What are some of your favorites?

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Guest Blog: Mika

No news on the querying front here, which is why things have been so quiet lately. I also just finished with exams, so I have finally reached that blessed time of year known as summer vacation. So, since I have jack to say, I'm turning things over to Mika!

Mika was the other editor I had while revising TANGO. Whereas Marie is a professional copyeditor, Mika was great for catching inconsistencies in the story, or letting me know when my characters were totally OUT of character. She helped me fine-tune my plot, and is still nice enough to put up with me sending her a redone paragraph a hundred times. She's been insanely encouraging, and I love her to death. So this is her take on the editing process! It's completely different from Marie's, but equally useful. Enjoy!

You can follow Mika's blog HERE.

----------

My good friend and I were recently having drinks together at The Mint – kinda our place to hang and have a good glass of wine – when we were talking about how she can always rely on me for an honest opinion, because I am judgmental.

I was a little insulted. Because obviously, no one wants to be called judgmental.

So I retaliated with “I’m not ‘judgmental.’ I just look at things with a critical eye.”

And I guess for me, that’s what editing is all about. It’s looking at things with a critical eye.

I suppose by now you’re thinking, “Oh, jeez, that’s great advice. Good one, Mika. Marie’s blog post was way better than this garbage.”

And all I have to say back to that is, “Hey? GUESS WHAT?! There’s no one way to edit, so give me a break!”

And it’s so true. I’m not the typical editor. I started editing, because I told a person I reviewed for to get an editor. They asked if I would edit for them. That gig lasted me all of three chapters, out of a story that ended up being 20+.

So when I started editing for Sammy, I was like “oh man, what did I get myself into?” TANGO was a monster of a story, at over 70K words! 27 chapters! However many pages, and however many hours of editing that would need.

But I sucked it up, I delved, and just did what I do. And here is what that looks like for me…

Getting started:

I always edit with music. I like editing on Google Documents and on Microsoft Word. I haven’t had a bunch of experience editing hard copies, but there will be more on that later…. I will always have my email up, so I can quickly type any immediate questions to the author and send it via email or instant messenger once I have most of those questions figured out.

Basically what I’m saying is you need to get yourself comfortable, and in the zone. You can't edit when you’re distracted, or irritated, or anything else. So just make sure you’re in the right mindset first.

And the good stuff…

  1. Write what you feel, no matter what it is, about anything you see or read.

    If you see something that just pinches you wrong, even if it’s just how a word is used, let the author know. This is your job, so just do it. Don’t be afraid of doing this; just point the thing out, explain your defense, and go on to the next thing. If you feel something doesn’t work, all you have to do is say something. And write down everything that you feel about it. You get an emotional trigger, put it down. It reads awkwardly, put it down.

    You could think now that this doesn’t help much, because you could be editing every single word if you write what you “feel.”

    I never said I was conventional, did I?

    To clarify further: Let the author know about things you hate, and things you love. I can’t stress this enough. MAKE SURE THEY KNOW WHAT YOU LOVE ABOUT THE STORY. You can point out all the things you feel is wrong, because that’s what you need to do as your job as editor. But I think that equally important is pointing out those things that make you go, “Yeah! That’s awesome! Rock on!” and so forth. It lets the author know what works in terms of characterization, description, etc. and that is integral to the editing process for me. And nothing is too big or too little to mention.

    So….yeah. Go with your gut instinct. Some technical people (coughMariecough) might tell you what you’re doing is messed up (like using “since” to start a sentence). But if you’re honest about what you think and what you feel, then you’re doing the best job you can do.

  1. Nothing you do is wrong, but remember that it’s also not always right.

    One of the hardest things for me to do when editing with another person was conceding that I wasn’t always right about things. We would argue and bicker over the stupidest point, and easily write 200 words about it. And it would be over…oh, whether eyes were green, or if they were blue. Something that insignificant could have a big impact on the author, and it definitely helps you learn about how others edit, and what you do have wrong.

    I have trouble admitting when I’m wrong, so it was a great learning process for me (see above comment about starting sentences with “since.”) It was also really fascinating to see how much my opinion could differ to someone else’s, and that really helped me edit my work with more clarity and precision.

    And the last point about this I have to say is no matter what you say or change, it will always be at the discretion of the author. You might be 100% convinced that what you’ve done is perfectly perfect and there’s no way that it can get anymore, well, perfect. But guess what? It’s your word against theirs, and if they don’t want to change their main character’s name from Jackie O to Spock because you think it’s a good idea, then it’s not going to happen and you have to accept that graciously.

  1. Convince your author that if they don’t have two or more editors, to get another one.

    This is easily one of the best things you can do for your writing and editing process. For me, this was easily one of the best things to keep me motivated. I am competitive as hell, and when I saw my fellow editor chugging away and cranking out fully edited chapters, it just got my editing juices flowing too. It also helps to have people that will talk to you about the work besides the author, because chances are they will want to talk about the same things.

    It will help your author too, because they will have two+ editors asking questions, requesting new sections or chapters, etc. It will give them two perspectives, two sets of opinions, and it can facilitate some great discussion about the work, which is always good for any story, poem, whatever.

    ---

Editing for yourself:

So all of this so far has been in terms of editing for other people. It is much easier to edit someone else’s work, because the things you don’t like will stand out much more than when you’re editing your own stuff.

Needless to say, editing your own work is a lot harder. You’re more critical, and at the same time you don’t want to let anything go.

I loathe editing my own work, and like all writers out there, it’s hard to tough out critiques from other people, even if they’re right. It’s getting easier, as I do it more and more, but it’s still tough as nails. I never used to edit my work. I would just write it out a couple times, and then just post it. NOT A GOOD IDEA. So, the biggest thing is remember to stay critical and try to stay as detached as possible, and to give yourself several days after writing a paragraph, chapter, whatever, before you begin your editing. I find it easier to edit my own work in hard copy if I’ve got it on my computer, and vice versa.

---

Now, I do my editing very subjectively, as you can see from above. I just got into it one day, and now I’m considered a fairly decent amateur “editor” (though lord knows why people want to hear my opinion about anything).

That doesn’t mean that everyone can just start editing and be good at it. I’m sorry to break your hearts, but it requires a very, very deep background in writing. I’ve been writing for over 7 years. I started researching stuff like the English monarchical hierarchy, just so I knew 100% what the difference between an earl and a lord was for my own stories when I was only 12 or 13 years old. I spent hours upon hours looking up synonyms for colours, and then making sure I knew exactly what that colour looked like, so I could expand my vocabulary. You need to be decent at writing, at the very least, to be even a half-decent editor. You don’t need to be super organized, you don’t have to be a perfectionist, but you need to have experience, and lots of it.

To help further your knowledge, here is what I recommend. Write a bunch of stuff by hand. I never typed any of my work until about four years ago. It helped me a lot, because it gives you the opportunity to get your writing-flow going, without the distraction of the internet and whatever. When you transfer things to electronic, it also gives you an opportunity to self edit your work (if you are looking at your writing with a critical eye when you’re doing so), which will get you in the habit of catching things in other people’s stuff.

Also, invest in a good dictionary, and a good thesaurus. I like the Oxford versions, but just make sure it’s a nice one, and big (it helps boost your “smart” ego too).

And read read read!!!! I don’t know what your preferred genre is. I used to only read fantasy, but since grade 12 literature and English class, I have begun to expand my horizons. Read some classics, some postmodern (In the Skin of a Lion is a great book, though a little sophisticated), some regular old fiction, and whatever else tickles your fancy. I always judge my books by the covers, especially if I’m just looking for a new story without any recommendation. If you have a library card, USE IT. I just cannot stress how important it is for you all to read to improve your own writing!!!!!! Obviously, don’t take a book you love and steal passages from it (that is called PLAGIARISM and it is a terrible thing to do). But if there’s certain stylistic things you like, words you don’t know, underline them, research these things, find ways to make it totally your own.

Saturday, May 8, 2010

Guest Blog: Marie

I had two really incredibly people who helped me edit TANGO, and I'm afraid to think where my novel would be without them. They spent so much time helping me turn my terrible NaNoWriMo draft into something I was really proud of. Marie was really great about picking out all of my typos and unnecessary repetition (snapping twigs, anyone?), along with inconsistencies and countless other issues. She did professional writing and editing at university, and I can't thank her enough for all the work she's done. I really can't. She's just that fantastic. She was kind enough to write up a post on editing, which I hope you guys find useful!

You can follow Marie at her journal, HERE.

Love,
Sammy

----------

There are two great truths about editing:

1) You have to have a solid grasp of grammar and language, and
2) It's not for everyone.

Just as being a guitarist doesn't make you a drummer, so too does being a writer not make you an editor, though the crossover isn't unheard of.

Editors are, for the most part, perfectionists in every sense of the word. They are thorough, usually well-organised, efficient time managers and have an irrational love for the way changing the place of just one word can create an entirely different effect in a piece of fiction.

Writers and editors require the same sets of skills: knowledge of how sentences/paras/scenes/chapters/entire plots are constructed, understanding of grammar, awareness of fictional tools such as character/setting/point of view/etc, amongst other things. But writers use these skills in different ways than editors do. Writers immerse themselves in the creation; editors must remain removed or run the risk of missing what needs to be changed or fixed. Which is not to say editors shouldn't enjoy the piece they're working on, but it's easier to edit a piece if you're not holding your breath about what's going to happen next. If deadline permits, it's more than okay to read the work for enjoyment first, and then set to work editing it. But if something pops out at you while you're reading for pleasure, make sure you mark it! You might not pick it up next time.

There is no right or wrong way to edit. Every editor works differently, has different methods, it's just a matter of figuring out what works best for you. You should also find that most of your editing method can transfer from paper to screen. Communicating changes is different, and differs depending on where you're editing (Word documents/GoogleDocs/etc); screen editing also requires more frequent breaks to prevent muscle and eye strain. But for the most part, the way you go about the work will remain the same.

When I edit, it generally takes a few paragraphs to immerse myself in the work, to get myself to the point where the real world is background noise and all that really exists are the words and language. Once I reach that stage, I go back to the beginning and begin making changes. Singular words are usually what I notice first, where they appear in the sentence and then if they've been used recently, whether they sound similar to other words being used. As I go, I begin to take note of what I call the author's "Go to" words, those being words that the author uses all the time. The author is usually doing this unconsciously, so I highlight rather than change them, to make the author aware of what they're doing and help them prevent it in the future.

I gradually sink far enough into the role of editing where I can see the sentences as wholes, as well as parts of paragraphs. Once I reach that stage, I begin making changes to the sentences themselves, such as switching clauses and cutting entire groups of words. As I go, I also make notes of facts that have to be checked. You can assume that, if the author is writing about it, they know a fair deal about the subject, but it's possible they don't know everything. If something feels off, or something doesn't ring true, check it yourself or notify the author, just in case. Length is another thing to be aware of as you go. Weaker descriptions require more words than strong ones do, so find the strongest adjective (and avoid adverbs) or verb and use that, rather than a string of qualifying adjectives.

For the most part, editing can be broken down into four levels: light, medium, heavy and structural. Each level focuses on different things and the author will tell you which they want you to complete. In a paying job, heavy editing will earn more than light, because more work is required and more hours put in.

Light editing should include:
- spelling, grammar, punctuation
- incorrect usage (may/can, numbers in figures or words, etc)
- checking consistency (spelling, hyphenation, etc)
- paragraphing

It may include:
- checking sequences in lists, tables, etc
- checking cross references
- recording first references to figures, tables, etc

Medium editing should include:
- light editing
- rewriting sentences for greater coherency
- parallel structure changes
- passive to active voice
- inappropriate figures of speech
- confusing or incorrect statements
For fiction:
- continuity of plot, character, setting, etc
- consistent style of collaborative manuscripts
For non-fiction:
- check chapter previews, summaries or questions reflect chapter content
- key terms used consistently and vocab lists and index meet publishers criteria
- language suits audience

It may include:
- typemarking (headings, etc)

Heavy editing should include:
- light and medium editing
- improve text flow
- reduction of wordiness and cliches
- moving text
- reorganising heading levels
- suggesting additions or deletions

It may include:
- complete rewriting
- reducing word count

Structural editing should include:
- change structure and substance
- change content and organisation
For fiction:
- check characterisation, plot, etc
For non-fiction:
- check content against purpose and audience, chapter organisation, accuracy, etc.

Remember, though, it is possible to over edit. You are not the author of the work, just its editor. As such not only are you supposed to fix spelling errors and make sure the piece flows properly, but you also have to ensure the voice of the author and essence of the story shine through. Think of editing as polishing. Someone gives you a mirror, maybe with fingerprints or grime on it. You take a cloth and clean that mirror until it shines, and then present it back to the owner to do with it what they will.

Remember too that authors aren't going to agree with everything you say and it's their right to. All you can do is suggest and make your point of view clear. There will be difficulties but don't argue. You both have the same goal: to make the story the absolute best it can be.

If there's one thing every editor needs, whether they're working on hard copy or screen, no matter what level they're editing at, it's a style sheet. Style sheets are tables broken up into letter groups and are used to note down how something appears in the work to maintain consistency. You can find an example here and a blank here, though you can easily draw up your own, and change it to suit you.

As with everything, the more you do something, the better you get at it. Start small and don't pressure yourself. Try to enjoy it too. The satisfaction of knowing you've contributed to something like a book or story is immense and completely worth the time and effort.

Monday, May 3, 2010

Cover Art

I got my thesis printed and bound today, and just wanted to show off Jen's incredible cover art. If only I could use this for the actual book some day. *Sniff*

Kudos to whoever can guess who the woman on the cover is.

Sunday, May 2, 2010

Inspiration Comes in Odd Places

I was putzing around on querytracker.net today and came across an author who'd recently been offered representation. They posted their stats and because I found them interesting, I thought I'd share.

Received two offers of representation on 4/15 for my 83,000 word romantic comedy/chick-lit novel from D4EO Literary and Book Cents Literary.

For those of you interested, here are my stats:
Began querying: 12/1/09
Offers of representation: 4/15/10

Queries sent: 115
Positive Responses = 16
Negative Responses = 99


I think it's important to remember that finding an agent takes time. You send out tons of letters, and you get results like that. It's really important to remember this business is subjective. You'll get rejected, it's guaranteed. What one agent likes, another won't. If anything, this process is going to teach me patience. I'll always be thankful for that.

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

The Intern

For those of you who follow my ho-hum-this-is-my-life blog, you already know about this, but I thought I'd announce it on blogger as well. For the next four months, I'm going to be moving to Washington, DC to intern with the Elaine P. English Literary Agency (their blog can be found in the sidebar, for anyone interested). Elaine and Naomi were both incredibly nice and encouraging during our phone interview last week, and I can't wait to actually start working! I've been told I'll be blogging for them as well, so when I do post there, I'll be sure to leave a link. I'll also be doing administrative stuff, as well as reading queries, and all that goes along with it. It's all very exciting, and even though I have a place to stay (Thanks again, Simmy!), and my plane tickets, it's kind of surreal. 45 internship applications landed me with the perfect one. Like one of my earlier posts said, perseverance pays off!

Besides that, some new things going on in my life:
1. Tonight the Madison Review (the literary journal I work for) is hosting a reading for this year's thesis students, and because I qualify under both titles, I'll be reading from ch.1 of TANGO. Nervous, but exciting!
2. I've begun writing the sequel to TANGO, entitled The Age of Consequence (TAC). Also exciting! (More than, but I'm at a loss for words as to how happy this makes me.)

Oh, and a public service announcement! If you live in Madison, WI, come to the Union on Thursday for the release party of Souvenirs! This is a local magazine I work for, which focuses on study abroad stories and art. We're going to have copies of the issues for you, as well as some ethnic dancing and music, and a DJ (who's actually my friend's boyfriend). Oh, and there will be food as well. So you should come!

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Nate's Thoughts

I was going through Nate's comments on part three of TANGO this evening, and they just made me laugh. I thought I'd share.

In no particular order, and with no context for you whatsoever...

"Blech!" x2

"God, it's like they're already married!"

"So sad :-("

"Lovely."

"BOO. Aema, stick with your man!"

"Great scene - naked ambush. Wow."

"H-O-T"

"Yikes!" x2

"It's always twigs snapping." (Marie and Mika will appreciate this.)

Saturday, April 17, 2010

On Finding an Agent

I did it. I finally made the big leap into the turbulent publishing waters - I sent out the first of my query letters. And in honor of that, I thought I would talk about how it was I came to decide which agents to query.

Step 1. This may seem obvious, but finish your manuscript. And don't just finish it, revise it. Polish it up as best you can. Have people look over it. Step away from it for a while, then come back. You'll be surprised at the things you've missed. No agent wants to see a manuscript riddled with typos and plot holes. Because I had a deadline, I didn't have the luxury of stepping away from TANGO. I just plowed ahead, relying on Mika and Marie (two friends who graciously offered to edit my novel) to catch any mistakes I made. As it turns out, I have a pension for repetition. Names, words, phrases, I am guilty of them all. Luckily, my manuscript is now much more diverse, and I believe there is only one instance of 'snapping twigs.' (Inside joke, forgive me.) But that is why you need to edit, edit, edit. I still find mistakes in published books every now and again, but that doesn't mean you're allowed to turn in a sloppy manuscript full of them. If you were an agent, would you want to read something that was just a messy first draft? I doubt it.

Step 2. Read. This can be done before or alongside step one, but I still think it's a necessity. Pay attention to the way other writers handle dialogue or setting. Take note of what works and what doesn't. If you have a problem writing really emotional scenes, look at how others exicute them. It's like homework, only much more fun.

Step 3. This goes hand-in-hand with step two: Hang out at your local bookstore. Pay attention to what is selling. Are those tables at the front of the store full of vampires and werewolves? Great, if you wrote a YA covering just that topic! Not so great if you wrote a self-help book on how to make floral arrangements. Check out other books in your genre, and check how similar yours might be. Agents don't want to see the same thing over and over again, so if your novel is basically a copy of William Faulkner's As I Lay Dying, complete with a chapter whose sole sentence is "My mother is a fish," then you might have some problems finding someone who would want to represent your book.

It's always good to know your competition, and know it well.

Step 4. Do your research. Once you select a genre for your novel, head to somewhere like agentquery.com. It can help you find agents who will represent your genre of writing. Don't rely on that site, though. Once you've found a few agents, check out their websites. AgentQuery is not always up to date on submission requirements, and you don't want your query to be rejected because you forgot to send the first five pages, or because you attached something when you shouldn't have. Or worse yet, that your #1 choice for an agent is no longer accepting unsolicited submissions. Simple googling will also get you some results. Try and be specific, though, if you're going the Google route. "Literary agent + science fiction," for example. See what happens.

Also, it's a good idea to read the agent bios, besides just the submission guidelines. Many of them have worked at other agencies, and you can then check those out as well for potential agents. Those bios are also your bible. A lot of times, they'll tell you exactly what that person is looking for. If what you wrote doesn't qualify, move on. Maybe that other agency they worked at will represent your kind of story. Or maybe even someone else within the agency.

Another good trick is to look up the agents of authors you enjoy. If you enjoy reading science fiction, and that's what your book is about, chances are some of those agents might be interested. If you read YA, but your story is meant for adults, maybe don't try this method, but I've found a few potential agents based on books I enjoy reading.

Step 5. Read agent/agency blogs. These are bibles for budding young authors. Nathan Bransford's blog has been my savior many a time over the past few months. He tells you exactly how to write your query letter, how to format it, along with your manuscript and synopsis. He also gives a lot of really great insight into the publishing industry, which is always helpful for those of us trying to get our start. If an agent you're interested in has a blog, make sure you look it over. Blogs tell a lot about a person, and agents often will tell you what they are and are not looking for. Also, it's good to personalize your query letters, so the more you know about a person, the better.

Those are what I would consider the basic steps of hunting down the perfect agent. Once you've got a decent list (Mine is currently hovering between 50 and 60), you can start sending out those query letters.

Which is what I'll talk about next time!

XoXo,
Sammy

Blogs I've found really helpful when it comes to finding an agent:
Nathan Bransford
Dystel & Goderich
BookEnds LLC
Miss Snark
Pub Rants
Janet Reid
FinePrint

Friday, April 9, 2010

The Importance of Not Being a Hermit

For me, writing is more than just a hobby. It's not just something I do for fun, or to kill time when I'm bored. To me, writing is my life. It's what I went to school for, and it's probably the only thing I'm really good at (besides baking). I can't do math to save my life, and science goes way over my head. I'm not crafty, or a good businesswoman (I could never advise people on money, since I spend all of mine). I'm a huge klutz, and I hate sports. I can't stand the sight of blood, and as much as I wish I could paint, I can't even draw a convincing stick person.

No. For me, it's always been writing.

However, I've come to realize a small downside in being a writer, and that is the tendency to become a hermit.

I am guilty of this, I will admit it. I wish it weren't so, but the fact of the matter is, when I'm writing, I tune out the world. I get so wrapped up in this other world I've created, that I forget about the one I'm living in. As I mentioned last time, I forget to eat. I forget to go to the bathroom, or comb my hair, or put on makeup. Half the time, I forget to change into something other than pajamas. I don't sleep a lot, and forget about (or choose to skip) class. The characters in my story feel so real that I sometimes forget that I have real friends, who matter a great deal more.

After being locked away for the last two weeks, I emerged from my writer's cave today feeling oddly out of touch. I have seven other roommates, and hadn't some of them since before spring break. I had no idea we were having a party this weekend, or what had been going on in their lives, and I felt terrible.

As writers, we tend to get sucked into the vortex of our imaginations. Characters in our story feel like real people, and maybe you feel like you even know them better (this is probably true, considering you created them). But it's important to remember that they're just that - fiction. They will never be a real person you can interact with.

The nice thing is, my friends and family understand how important it was for me to finish this book. It wasn't just my thesis, it's what I'm hoping to base my writing career on. It's not just an A on my transcript. I'm so grateful to have people that understand why I sometimes disappear for weeks at a time. Even still, I am hereby promising to never pull a two week disappearance act again, unless absolutely necessary (which, I'm hoping, it won't be). I missed my friends, and the way we can make just about anything funny. I missed hanging out in the living room and making fun of people on TV. I missed planning themed parties, or cooking. Or just talking to people. Granted, I had a strict deadline to meet that got moved up unexpectedly, so I couldn't help my disappearance this time. Next time, though, I will make sure to remind myself to take a break more often, and to make sure I spent time with the people who matter most.

As much as I love Lottery, Aema and Darius, friend and family are infinitely better.

Sunday, April 4, 2010

Deadlines: The Best Diet Ever

One thing I've learned since beginning my thesis in January (aka finishing TANGO, then editing it) is that deadlines are the Best Diet Ever.

Really.

Since January, I've lost close to ten pounds.

Some authors like to have food around when they're writing. A drawer devoted to chocolate. A stash of jellybeans nearby. A bag of chips. Me, I like to have bottled water or Gatorade. I can't eat while I write, because I hate it when crumbs fall on my keyboard and get lost beneath my keys. (This happens entirely too often, despite my protests.)

I've never been much for deadlines. I like to write at my own pace, and deadlines always scared me. Nate, however, made sure to set deadlines over the course of the semester. Every two weeks I'd have to turn in a chunk of pages, and I'd usually be scrambling a few days before hand, trying to edit everything so it didn't suck when I turned it in.

That's how it started, anyway. Because I was sending chapters in order, and I'd already written the first two sections of the book, I didn't have a whole lot of editing to do. I'd check for typos, maybe change a few words, but that was about it. Still, I'd fuss over those pages to the point that I'd forget to eat. I'd spend hours in front of my computer, debating whether or not to change a comma to a semicolon, or vice versa.

As the semester progressed, I realized I had a lot more work ahead of me than I'd thought. So, when I met with Nate at the end of February, I really started heeding his deadlines. I'd work on TANGO every day. I'd spend an hour or two looking over a chapter, or writing bits of new material. Again, I'd get so caught up in this that I would forget to eat.

As February turned into March, and I was told of the Eudora Welty Fiction Thesis Prize, I was given a new deadline. THE deadline. April 21st, 2010. That was the day I needed to turn in my story, and it had to be done. I was terrified, considering the fact I had at least five chapters to write (I believe it turned out to be seven or eight, actually). That night, after my meeting, I sat down in front of my computer, sans dinner, and began typing.

By 3am, I'd knocked off one of those remaining chapters. And so the pattern continued. I'd write late into the night, forget to eat dinner. Eventually, I think I gave up on even trying to remember. I had a deadline, and I was going to meet it, goddamnit.

Spring break rolled around, and I left my house maybe twice. For 12-18 hours a day, I sat and worked on revising my story. I'd finished it the week before, and had three weeks until everything was due. It wasn't a lot of time, but I was determined to have my thesis in Nate's hands on April 21st if it killed me. So I'd wake up and write/revise for a few hours, eat lunch, and write/revise until 2 or 3am. It was fun some of the time, to be honest. I got even closer to my characters, and I spent a good deal of time deleting huge chunks of text, then filling them with better things. I probably cut nearly half the story, and rewrote it. And as much as I deleted, I still ended up with a second draft that was 3000 words longer than the original.

And I'm still not done. I have one more week of revisions before I send TANGO to Kinkos to be printed and bound. But I have a schedule to follow, which has made everything so much easier. I should add a line for 'eat dinner' on it because, even now, I still forget to eat. Right now, as I type this, I'm reminding myself that I need to eat dinner (a glass or orange juice doesn't cut it, I'm afraid). When you love your story, you get sucked into it. The real world doesn't exist. All that exists are your characters, and they probably aren't eating (I've realized I have very few scenes in my story where the characters are actually interacting with food, which would have been a good reminder to me...). I hear that doctors performing surgery have a similar experience. They forget how tired they are, or that they're hungry, or have to pee. To me, that's what writing a good story is like.

I hope that means TANGO is a good story.

Some advice: When you're writing (and revising, especially), make sure to keep food nearby. Unless you want to lose weight. In which case, make sure you lock yourself in your room and don't see the sun for two weeks.

I should coin this diet. I really should.

The Long and Short of It

As we all know, one cannot be published without first having a story. Here's the short version of where TANGO came from:

My head.

Now for the long version.

It was a rainy Friday in Galway, Ireland. Not wholly unexpected. My apartment was five minutes from campus, so I'd woken up at 8:45 for my 9am class. I trekked to campus without an umbrella because, as some of you may know, they tend to be rather useless. The wind turns them inside out, and no matter what, you still end up getting wet. (What I'd really like to know is how Irish girls keep their hair straight, even when walking to class in the rain.)

Generally, I didn't go to my 9am Nazi Germany lecture, simply because it was early, and in one of the furthest buildings on the main campus. (Do not get me started about my adventure trying to find the business building). However, this particular Friday interested me. The syllabus said we'd be talking about life inside Auschwitz and other death camps, and my interest in Nazi Germany is through the roof. The politics, not so much, but the lives people led? Those are stories I'd like to hear.

I made it to class on time, unsurprised by the lack of attendance. Friday morning lectures were generally pretty empty. Dr. Healy (for anyone planning to attend the National University of Ireland-Galway, take Roisin Healy's class. She's brilliant) spent the 90 minute class showing us pictures of death camps, and the emaciated figures who lived (and died) there. She also mentioned the infamous Dr. Mengele, and his medical experiments. Briefly, she talked about him (or some other doctor) trying to cure death, and I remember thinking, "What if they had?"

Immediately, I pulled out my notebook and began jotting down ideas. By the end of class, I had the title, along with character names, and a very basic plot. I practically skipped home. I hadn't written anything in months, and I'd had a difficult time in Ireland. Writing has always been a huge comfort to me, and the thought of having a new story to work on was exciting. I spent the next week or so planning the story, and developing the characters in my mind. By the time NaNoWriMo rolled around, I was ready.

Over the course of 30 days, I wrote over 50,000 words for my story.

Then, I stopped. I didn't touch it until late December, when I got the idea for chapter 24, a chapter that I am still ridiculously proud of. And once I'd written that, I stopped again. Spring semester was fast approaching, and I needed to decide what to use for my senior thesis (creative writing majors are asked to write either a collection of poetry, a collection of short stories, or a novel). I had another story, an old one, I was considering dragging out of the closet, but when Nate told me I could use the next four months to finish TANGO, I couldn't pass up the opportunity.

And that, my friends, is how TANGO was born.

Friday, April 2, 2010

An Introduction of Sorts

As I pass the halfway mark in my revisions of The Age of Never Growing Old (henceforth referred to as TANGO), I thought it might be a good idea to document this entire process. That being, from writing my manuscript, to querying, and hopefully seeing it on a shelf someday.

But first, a little about myself!

I like candlelit dinners, white roses, and long walks on the beach.

No, really. I do.

But that's not even marginally important.

Ahem.

I grew up in the Midwest, and am currently a senior at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where I'm majoring in creative writing. I've been there since 2008, after transferring colleges twice. I also studied abroad in Galway, Ireland last year, so I think I'm pretty skilled in terms of moving. And packing. (For the record, packing up your life six times in four months? Not advisable.) I started off as a journalism major, then switched to creative writing when I realized I had no desire to write for other people - I wanted to write for myself. I was also an art history major for two years, but dropped that when I found out it was going to keep me in school far longer than necessary.

TANGO, my thesis, was actually something I started during NaNoWriMo in 2009. I was in Ireland, sitting in my Nazi Germany class, when I got the idea. Regardless of the fact that my study abroad experience wasn't always positive, I will forever love Ireland, if only because it inspired this story.

Here's the first paragraph from the first (and awful) draft of my query letter, just to give you an idea of what TANGO is about:

When you decide who lives and dies in a society where natural death is impossible, you can protect yourself from just about anyone and anything. That’s what Lottery thought — until he discovers Aema, the love of his life, is seeing someone else. Consumed by jealousy, he marks his rival Darius for execution in the upcoming Selection. Unfortunately for him, Temicus, the Centre's all-powerful leader, has noticed his preoccupation with Aema, and decides to have her killed as well. Now Lottery must enlist Darius's help to keep the woman they love alive. Together, they formulate a plan to escape the Centre and to destroy everything it stands for.

While my thesis advisor, Nate, has informed me that dystopian literature is a sub-category of science fiction, I'm having a hard time categorizing TANGO, simply because it crosses a few boundaries. It's sci-fi, yes, but it's also a romance. There's some suspense and mystery thrown in for fun, and it is very much character-driven. Obviously there's a plot - how could there not be? - but it's fueled by character interactions, which I think isn't entirely common. At least Nate said it wasn't, and I'm tempted to listen to him, since he's (relatively) older and (definitely) wiser.

So now that you know a little about me, and a little about my novel, I will bid you adieu. And leave you with this article from The Rejectionist, one of my favorite blogs.

Cheers,
SN